Website is Live!!!

Back on the first day of class Erin (prof) made it clear that she wishes to make archaeology more accessible to the masses, including individuals who do not have any academic experience in archaeology. I happen to agree with what Erin is trying to accomplish. To help bring archaeological topics to the greater public the class was divided into groups and we were assigned to present a case study through an online format.

Balnuaran of Clava - http://scotlandcairns.weebly.com/balnuaran-of-clava.html

I was one of three group members who made up the Scottish Burial Chamber case study group. And today I get to say that our website is officially done! You have no idea how happy I am that the website is live for everyone to see. The website is www.scotlandcairns.weebly.com and please go and look at it I am really proud of what we did.

Out of all of the projects that I have done in my undergrad studies, I think this is one of my favorites. By working on this project I have learned more than had I written an essay. We formatted out website with the knowledge that not everyone visiting our website would have the same academic background as we do. This changed how we wrote and the length of our site descriptions. As a group we made a conscious effort to incorporate aspects of lecture information onto the website, such as the database we were first introduced to at the beginning of the semester.

Please go to our website. Enjoy what we have created. And educate yourself about Scottish burial cairns.   

Toss it to Maggie

Earlier this week we watched a documentary in class called "Speakers for the Dead".

The documentary takes place in Priceville Ontario (not too far from Owen Sound) and it deals with the hidden history of Blacks in Canada by means of a local cemetery. Below is a synopsis of the documentary from the NFB website (http://www.nfb.ca/film/speakers-for-the-dead/):

“This documentary reveals some of the hidden history of Blacks in Canada. In the 1930s in rural Ontario, a farmer buried the tombstones of a Black cemetery to make way for a potato patch. In the 1980s, descendants of the original settlers, Black and White, came together to restore the cemetery, but there were hidden truths no one wanted to discuss. Deep racial wounds were opened. Scenes of the cemetery excavation, interviews with residents and re-enactments--including one of a baseball game where a broken headstone is used for home plate--add to the film's emotional intensity.”

Cover of the documentary - http://media6.nfb.ca/medias/nfb_tube/jackets/speakers-for-the-dead.jpg

Within the documentary a side comment was made about a group of school kids who used a headstone from the cemetery that had the name Maggie on it (hence the name of this blog post). They used the headstone as the home plate. When I heard this, a knot formed in my stomach. The only thought that came to my mind was of how disrespectful they were. We didn’t hear how the children felt about using the headstone as home plate but I wonder if they felt bad or if they just didn’t care or didn’t know. It’s odd that I feel this way because monument isn’t human remains, ‘only’ documentation. Overall this documentary resonated with me more than I initially thought it would. I think it’s because most of my family is currently from Southern Ontario,  that this documentary resonated with me.

Below is a link to youtube where you can watch "Speakers for the Dead" in its entirety for yourself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0fbINBjb6I

Multiple Uses For Crypts

Earlier this week I picked up a 'Time Magazine' at the BiblioCafe on campus.
Within the issue I came across a photo captioned 'Life in Ruins . The photo consisted of a girl in Syria entering into a crypt. Due to the increased turmoil in the area people (including the girl in the photo) are moving into the crypts for safety and are living there.

Initially, I found the reuse of the crypts as living quarters to be strange. Until I thought about it more. And much like living anywhere there are pros's and con's living with the dead, but I think in the example used in the 'Time Magazine' produces more pro's then con's. Primarily, the architectural construction of the crypts provide protection from the turmoil that is happening up above and they provide a safe place to sleep. The only thing you need to get over is the fact of living with the dead.

Could you live with the dead?

Taken to the Grave

I asked a few of my friends today 'what would you include in your burial?' And I got some amazing answers but by far the best answer was as follows:

"I [female] would be buried with a sword, a bronze weapon, and many coins. I will have a mummified cat and  some other sort of taxidermied animal."

When I asked my friend in what position she would be buried in she quickly replied "in the fetal position facing in the direction that typical males are in to f**k with future archaeologists"

As I have written in previous posts, I wouldn't mess with archaeologists in that way. Archaeologically it would be very difficult to find physical biological remains (for my physical being). Although my physical being would not be found by archaeologist I would like archaeologists to come across my name in historical documents within my family tree; and perhaps the novels that I am currently working on. 

Aog Sgeul Case Study Work

Today our group took a moment to work on our case study that was assigned for class.
While working on our own individual sites I came across something interesting happening at the Balnuaran of Clava cairn in Scotland. Turns the 3 cairns that make up the site have been restored a number of times. This then sparked a group discussion about the differences between conservation, restoration, and the ethical ramifications. 

Conservation is the prevention of further deterioration and some preventative care. Individuals who do conservation work on artifacts are required to acquire additional education before doing any working in the field. 

Restoration on the other had is the act of returning an artifact to the condition it was in when it was first created. Restoration unlike conservation apparently does not require additional education. Who knew?  

Balnuaran of Clava was first restored by the land owner in the 1880s and has later been restored in the 40s and 50s. The restoration was constructed so that the site looked the way that the landowner and archeologists thought it would have looked like when it was first constructed. The reconstructions were done so tourists could go and see the site. Know ethically is it appropriate to restore cairn sites so that tourists can go and walk into them? I don't know. On the one hand I agree with the practise, for possible learning opportunities. On the other hand I disagree, because is it our place to speculate what these monuments looked like for tourist reasons. 

One Last Trip

When I was younger I always wanted my remains to be put on a wooden raft and sent out to sea. A few years back I decided to look into the feasibility of this plan. Turns out sending human remains out to sea on a raft is sort of frowned upon in Canada (in most places actually). I am sure that there is still a possibility of my wishes being granted; however it would involve a lot of legal paper work.

An alternative to me being sent out to sea once I pass away; I have now decided to be cremated. More specifically I would like my ashes to be combined with Terra’s (my late dog) ashes. It is written in my will that one of my friends/love ones will (once I pass) go on a trip with my ashes. My ashes will be scattered throughout the trip (but not at the top of a roller coaster). This way my friend/loved one, myself, and Terra can all go on one last trip together.